The website, which has formed youth hockey in the United States and Canada, has partially announced the weekly rankings of thousands of teams in both countries, ending its practice at the youngest level of competition.
Neil Lodin, founder of MYHockey Rankings, said on his website on Wednesday that the platform would no longer give digital rankings to teams of children under 12, and explained that the rating promotes an unhealthy approach to play by adults.
“Youth sport has become a rat race between parents, coaches and clubs,” Lodin wrote. The “is this” if you do not continue Jones, do you love your child? “Mentality exists.
“The youth hockey community is not insured against these issues,” he said in a statement. “And to be honest, ratings are a contributing factor when they are used in a negative and excluded way, instead of as a coaching tool and planning resource.”
In December 2021, MYHockey Rankings and its influence was the subject of an article in The New York Times. Ken Martel, director of player development at the U.S. hockey, sports governing body, said in the article that he feared that the ratings of some parent, coach and youth hockey associations would have a detrimental effect on player development and game value. The game.
The website’s ability to gain and break an array of statistics on thousands of teams, ranging in age from 9 to 18, has made it an indispensable resource for many in the youth hockey community.
At its core is a sophisticated algorithm that predicts a team’s “performance rating” and goal differentiation from any game it can play against any opponent in the database. Coaches and tournament directors regularly use the website to identify teams that are scheduled to make equal comparisons and plan games accordingly.
But critics argue that the auxiliary practice of the website in assigning numerical rankings to teams has prompted the primary instinct to climb the ladder of youth hockey stakeholders during an endless one-on-one game.
In an interview, Lodin said the website would continue to provide key data that helped make planning decisions – such as win-loss records, game results and other statistics – while eliminating the rankings of its youngest teams. The site has visited around 3,000 teams of children under the age of 12 during the last season of hockey.
“We are taking steps that we think are forcing users to use the site as it was intended as a tool to help teams plan relevant levels of competition, as opposed to hockey,” Lodin said.
Tom Farrell, executive director of the Aspen Institute’s Sports and Community Program, who was given the idea of getting rid of the clutter by keeping data that helps teams compete well, called the move a “step in the right direction.” . ”
“It sends the message that development is more important than comparing children and teams that are still in the early stages of development,” Farim said.
Martel, United States hockey, welcomed the development.
“It will hopefully ease the pressure a bit,” he said. “We are a late developing sport. The best young kids are not the best kids later. No one knows who is really good before puberty.